<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
        xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >
<channel>
        <title>Governance &#38; Securities Watch - Feed</title>
        <atom:link href="https://governance.weil.com/contributor/drew-tulumello/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://governance.weil.com/contributor/drew-tulumello/</link>
        <description>What&#039;s New: Updates from Weil’s Governance, Securities &#38; Reporting Group</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:47:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language></language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        
                                        <item>
                        <title>Supreme Court Condones All-PurposeJurisdiction Over Companies Registered to Do Business</title>
                        <link>https://governance.weil.com/whats-new/supreme-court-condones-all-purposejurisdiction-over-companies-registered-to-do-business/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 13:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Tulumello]]></dc:creator>
													<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Josh Wesneski ]]></dc:creator>
														<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Zack Tripp ]]></dc:creator>
							                        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://governance.weil.com/?p=1991</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Today, in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., the Supreme Court held (5-4) that a State may require a company to consent to the all-purpose jurisdiction of its courts as a condition for registering to do business in that State. Writing for the majority, Justice Gorsuch observed that the Supreme Court has long held that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://governance.weil.com/whats-new/supreme-court-condones-all-purposejurisdiction-over-companies-registered-to-do-business/">Supreme Court Condones All-PurposeJurisdiction Over Companies Registered to Do Business</a> appeared first on <a href="https://governance.weil.com">Governance &amp; Securities Watch</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., the Supreme Court held (5-4) that a State may require a company to consent to the all-purpose jurisdiction of its courts as a condition for registering to do business in that State. Writing for the majority, Justice Gorsuch observed that the Supreme Court has long held that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://governance.weil.com/whats-new/supreme-court-condones-all-purposejurisdiction-over-companies-registered-to-do-business/">Supreme Court Condones All-PurposeJurisdiction Over Companies Registered to Do Business</a> appeared first on <a href="https://governance.weil.com">Governance &amp; Securities Watch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Spotlight on Recent Decision Regarding “Sustainably Sourced” Labeling and Consumer Deception</title>
                        <link>https://governance.weil.com/sustainability-and-environmental-social-and-governance-advisory/spotlight-on-recent-decision-regarding-sustainably-sourced-labeling-and-consumer-deception/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Tulumello]]></dc:creator>
													<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Arianna Scavetti ]]></dc:creator>
							                        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://governance.weil.com/?p=1681</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[In this special edition of Weil’s Class Action Monitor, we discuss a recent decision that illustrates the litigation risks associated with marketing...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this special edition of Weil’s Class Action Monitor, we discuss a recent decision that illustrates the litigation risks associated with marketing related to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) initiatives and commitments on product labels. In this case, Walker v. Nestlé USA, a court in the Southern District of California denied the defendant’s motion to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://governance.weil.com/sustainability-and-environmental-social-and-governance-advisory/spotlight-on-recent-decision-regarding-sustainably-sourced-labeling-and-consumer-deception/">Spotlight on Recent Decision Regarding “Sustainably Sourced” Labeling and Consumer Deception</a> appeared first on <a href="https://governance.weil.com">Governance &amp; Securities Watch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
        </channel>
</rss>