As the 2020 proxy season looms on the near horizon, recent pronouncements on Rule 14a-8 no-action requests by the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Division or Staff) may have significant implications for the shareholder proposal no-action letter process. Last week, the Division published Staff Legal Bulletin (SLB) No. 14K, which provides guidance and observations, based on the Staff’s experience during the 2019 proxy season, regarding the application of Rule 14a-8(i)(7)’s “ordinary business” exclusion in two key areas: (1) the nature and scope of the “significance” analysis needed to support a company’s (i)(7) no-action request, and the importance to the Staff of knowing what the board of directors thinks in situations where a shareholder proponent argues that a policy issue raised in his or her proposal transcends ordinary business; and (2) the contours of the “micromanagement” prong of the ordinary business exclusion analysis. SLB No. 14K also re-emphasizes the Division’s “substance-over-form” approach to dealing with technical proponent proof-of-ownership deficiencies. As such, SLB No. 14K builds on previous post-season Division guidance set forth in SLB Nos. 14I, 14J and 14F.
Heads up for the 2020 Proxy Season: The SEC Weighs in on Rule 14a-8 No-Action Requests
Copyright © 2020 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, All Rights Reserved. The contents of this website may contain attorney advertising under the laws of various states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is headquartered in New York and has office locations in Beijing, Boston, Dallas, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Miami, Munich, New York, Paris, Princeton, Shanghai, Silicon Valley, and Washington, D.C.